South Sudan has taken a drastic measure to curb the spread of violent content on social media, announcing a 30-day block on all social media platforms starting from midnight on January 22, 2025. This decision comes amid rising violence and unrest in the region, particularly in neighboring Sudan.
The National Communication Authority (NCA) issued a directive to internet service providers, citing concerns over public safety and mental health. The authority claims that graphic content circulating on social media platforms violates local laws and poses a significant threat to vulnerable groups, including women and children.
This move is not unprecedented in Africa, where several countries have restricted social media access in recent years. Since 2015, about 31 countries in Africa, including Uganda, Senegal, and Chad, have blocked or limited social media access, often during elections, protests, or exams.
The current crisis in Sudan has led to a surge in violence against South Sudanese nationals, prompting international condemnation. The African Union Commission chairperson, Moussa Faki Mahamat, has urged restraint in the face of Sudan’s civil conflict, which has resulted in a severe humanitarian crisis.
In response to the escalating violence, South Sudan has also enforced a dusk-to-dawn curfew since January 17. The government has justified these measures as necessary to maintain public order and prevent further attacks.
The Humanitarian Crisis in Sudan
The conflict in Sudan has led to a devastating humanitarian crisis, with over 30 million people in need of humanitarian aid. The International Rescue Committee (IRC) has reported that 14.6 million people are forcibly displaced, making it the largest and fastest displacement crisis in the world.
The IRC has also warned of a looming famine in Sudan, with 750,000 people facing catastrophic food insecurity. The organization has scaled up its humanitarian efforts, providing critical aid to affected populations, including refugees in neighboring countries.
The Impact of Social Media Restrictions
While the South Sudanese government’s decision to block social media may be intended to prevent the spread of violent content, it is likely to have significant consequences for the population. Social media platforms have become essential tools for communication, information-sharing, and organization, particularly during times of crisis.
The restrictions may also have economic implications, as they may disrupt business operations and limit access to information and services. In 2024, African countries lost an estimated $1.5 billion due to internet and social media shutdowns, African Countries like Ethiopia had shut down internet and Social Media to control religious tension.
Conclusion
The situation in South Sudan and Sudan is complex and volatile, with far-reaching humanitarian implications. While the South Sudanese government’s decision to block social media may be intended to maintain public order, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of such restrictions to the country and it’s Citizens.
As the international community continues to monitor the situation, it is crucial to prioritize humanitarian aid, support affected populations, promote media right and promote peaceful resolution to the conflict
